Bodybuilding forum - Hypermuscles.com

Go Back   Bodybuilding forum - Hypermuscles.com > [- MY BODY-BUILDING -] > Diet and Nutrition > Nutrition articles

anabolic steroids Muscle Build Blog Steroids Sale steroids cycles Buy Sciroxx Steroids
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2009, 04:13 PM
musclesprod.com's Avatar
HyperMuscles Partner
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 147
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 0
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 0
Post Burn More Calories By Lifting 1 Second Up, 3 Seconds Down

In 2007, Jim Karas wrote the book,” The Cardio-Free Diet." The book was highly controversial and was condemned by cardiologists and other health professionals. The author claimed, "Cardiovascular exercise kills a weight-loss plan, your internal organs, your immune system, your time and your motivation. If your true goal is to lose weight, interval strength training is the only way to go." The author wrote the book after his personal experiment with weight loss, he found that he would work up an enormous appetite after running several miles. Karas claimed that his cardiovascular health improved but he still wasn't losing weight. He grew more interested in strength training and started exercising with weights. Gradually, experimenting on himself, he started doing more strength exercise and less cardio -- and his weight went down. Karas was criticized by fitness experts for confusing the public with the facts, although long distance running such as a marathon runners and long distance cyclists and so forth have higher rates of respiratory infections and suppressed immune function. This is well known, contrary to long distance exercise, moderate intensity aerobic exercise increases the immune system. Moderate intensity aerobic exercise increases lymphocytes, results in an increase in immune system T-cells, and an increase in natural killer cells, which are all implicated in a reduced risk of cancer.

Does Cardio Kill Fat Loss?
Contrary to Karas book on aerobic not been helpful for fat loss, peer reviewed research studies have shown aerobic exercise to reduce bodyfat. For example, in 2007, a study was published in prestigious journal of Obesity titled: A dose-response relation between aerobic exercise and visceral fat reduction: systematic review of clinical trials. The review article documented that in a when 582 subjects from various studies were analyzed, visceral fat decreased significantly with aerobic exercises that were performed at brisk walking, light jogging or stationary ergometer, and that there is a dose-response relationship between aerobic exercise and visceral fat reduction in obese subjects without metabolic-related disorders1. One thing the study documented was that there was a relationship between the amount of time and intensity spent doing cardio and fat loss. Women may be at a disadvantage compared to men for losing weight thru aerobic exercise. In a previous study, obese men and women trained 5 days a week for 45 minutes a day at 75% of their max heart rate. The obese men had a significant enhancement of metabolism after exercise but not women15. This suggests that aerobic exercise may not be the best choice of exercise to increase metabolism. I read recently the chronicles of a fitness and figure competitor that wanted to complete an IRONMAN triathlon. She trained for seven months, she calculated that she worked out for a total of 374 hours for the Ironman— that's an average of over thirteen hours a week! Amazingly, over the course of seven months, training an average of thirteen to fourteen hours a week, she lost a total of five pounds! She was glad to have said that she completed an Ironman competition but she learned a valuable lesson, steady state cardio is not conducive for fat loss. She said, “For fat loss women should “Learn to Love Intensity, Not Duration! “

Metabolic Rate
Before jumping into what exercise mode is the best for increasing metabolism, lets examine the three components that will determine a woman’s metabolism.

• Resting metabolic rate (RMR) is defined as the energy expenditure necessary to maintain the physiological processes in the post-absorptive state and, depending on the level of physical activity, may represent approximately 60 to 70% of total energy expenditure.

• Diet Induced Thermogenesis (DIT) refers to the increase in metabolic rate above resting levels due to food intake (i.e. high protein foods) and corresponds to approximately 10% of total energy expenditure.

• Physical activity is the most variable component and is related to the energy expenditure necessary for skeletal muscle activity. In sedentary individuals it represents approximately 15% of total energy expenditure, whereas in physically active individuals this can reach 30%

Aerobic Versus Weight Lifting Effects on Metabolism
For a long time, a reduced calorie diet and aerobics exercise has been advocated for weight loss. The problem with aerobic exercise and diet is that studies indicate that, when food restriction is very severe, the combination of aerobic and diet results in losses in lean muscle mass10, 11, consequently leading to a reduction in metabolic rate12. Lean muscle mass contributes to the largest contribution of total metabolism. Be forewarned, if you are a cardio queen…you are not going to like this section! If you have 30 minutes to exercise, you look at the treadmill and then look at the circuit weight training section, which is more effective for fat loss? Researchers compared duration and magnitude of metabolism after exercise in a typical resistance exercise session with that of aerobic exercises with same duration (27 min) and intensity. Results showed that oxygen consumption (a measure of metabolism) remained significantly elevated up to 90 min after terminating the resistance exercises and only 30 min after the aerobic activity. Calories burned after exercise was higher during the first 30 min after resistance exercises than after the aerobic exercise, representing an additional energy expenditure of 95kcals for circuit training and 64 kcal for aerobics13. Sorry, cardioaddicts...Don’t shoot the messenger!


Cardio and Weight Training Better for Fat Loss than Cardio Alone.
It has been shown that if you compare a head to head match for weight loss, performing resistance exercise with cardio is more effective than cardio alone. There are two studies that have shown that if you want to drop body fat: a combination of cardio and weight training is best!

Study 1:
In the study, 35 overweight subjects were placed in one of three groups for 12 weeks; diet-only (1500 calories per day); the same diet plus aerobic exercise; or diet plus aerobic and resistance exercise. The exercise programs were supervised by a team of personal trainers. Subjects in the diet and aerobic exercise group trained three days per week using a variety of activities (treadmill walking/jogging, cycling, rowing and stair climbing). The diet plus aerobic and resistance group trained with weights after the aerobic workout. The routine consisted of a complete body workout (machine squat, military press, bench press, lat pulldown, seated row, sit-up, lower back, leg press, hamstring curl, calf raise, and arm curl). The program involved heavy days (5-7 repetitions) and moderate days (8-10 repetitions). They took short rest periods (1 minute) between sets and exercises when using moderate loads and longer rest periods (2-3 minutes) with the heavier loads. Throughout the 12 weeks, subjects were encouraged to increase the amount of weight they used in each exercise. Twelve weeks later, all the groups had lost a similar amount of weight (between 20 and 22 pounds). However, fat loss was greatest and muscle loss was minimized in the group who trained with weights. In the group that followed the low-calorie diet for 12 weeks, 7 of every 10 pounds lost came from fat. In the group combining aerobic exercise with the low-calorie diet, 8 of every 10 pounds lost came from fat. In the group who dieted, exercised aerobically, and trained with weights, almost all of the weight lost came from fat.

Study 2: Thirty obese women were enrolled in the study for six months; the women were separated into three groups: a control group, an aerobic exercise group and a combined exercise group. The aerobic group did one hour of cardiovascular exercise (60-70% maximum heart rate) six days a week. The combined exercise program involved weight training (3 days a week, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) and aerobic exercise (3 days a week, Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday). At the end of the six months, the loss of fat was greatest in the combined group (19.7 pounds) compared with the aerobics-only (16.3 pounds) group. The combined group also lost almost three times more abdominal subcutaneous fat and 13% more visceral fat than the aerobic-only group. So what is it about resistance exercise that seems to supercharge the metabolism for fat loss? Many people think it’s because resistance exercise increases lean muscle mass which contributes to increased calorie burning. This is true, but researchers suspect that the main benefit of resistance exercise (other than the calories burned during the workout itself) is the effect it has on oxygen consumption after the workout. This is known as excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC).
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2009, 04:14 PM
musclesprod.com's Avatar
HyperMuscles Partner
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 147
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 0
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 0
Post

What is EPOC?
EPOC is a measurably increased rate of oxygen intake following strenuous activity. Increased EPOC means you burn more calories when you have finished exercise. The extra oxygen is used in the processes that restore the body to a resting state and adapt it to the exercise just performed. These include: (removal of lactic acid after exercise, restoration of muscle and blood oxygen stores, elevated body temperature, post exercise elevation of heart rate and breathing, elevated hormones and cell repair). Studies show that the EPOC effect exists after both anaerobic exercise and aerobic exercise, but all studies comparing the two show that anaerobic exercise increases EPOC more than aerobic exercise does. For exercise regimens of comparable duration and intensity, aerobic exercise burns more calories during the exercise itself4, but anaerobic exercise (exercise that causes high increases in lactic acid) burns more calories when you are finished exercising. Anaerobic exercise in the form of high-intensity interval training was also found in one study to result in greater loss of subcutaneous fat, even though the subjects expended fewer than half as many calories during exercise.


1 Second Up, 3 Seconds Down Increases EPOC for 72 hours!
Here at Fitness Rx for Women, we are dedicated to bring you the cutting edge research first! So if you really want to increase your metabolic rate, this is the workout routine for you, however be aware this program in hardcore! If you examine all the studies that have examined EPOC after resistance exercise, one study that reported the single greatest prolonged effect on metabolism was when the subjects used eccentric exercise on the leg press6. Eccentric exercise is when you lower the weight. Eccentric contractions tend to produce muscle damage and tend to produce muscle soreness. Researchers wanted to see what effect emphasizing the eccentric contraction would have on post-exercise metabolism. They recruited both trained and untrained subjects and had them before a full body, high volume exercise protocol with a protocol in which they raised the weight in 1 second but lowered it in 3 seconds. Eight sets of six repetitions were performed on eight exercise machines (Chest press, Leg Press, Biceps Curls, Lat Pull Downs, Leg Curls, Triceps Extensions, Shoulder Press, and Leg Extension.) So do you want the Good News or the Bad News First? The bad news was that all the subjects reported muscle soreness after the exercise program which the untrained subjects having more soreness; the good news is that the 1 second up, 3 seconds down protocol increased post-exercise metabolism for 72 hours after exercise9! Previous research using the 1 second up, 1 second down reported that exercise metabolism was increased for 14 to 15 hours7, 8, but here we have 72 hours with 1 second up, 3 seconds down! Why did this exercise program jack up the subject’s metabolism so much? The researchers suspected that it had to do with the muscle repair process. As mentioned previously, the subjects were extremely sore, it takes additional calories to repair muscle proteins so the increased metabolic advantage was likely due to muscle repair which takes energy. The trained subjects elevated their resting energy expenditure by 8% after the workout!
If you are a beginner, this program may be too much as many of the untrained subjects felt extreme muscle soreness so if you are just starting to exercise wait a few months before you try this program.

This article hopefully will give you a creative way to pump up your weight lifting routine. There are 2 ways to increase post-exercise calories being burned: either make your workout sessions longer or make them more intense. To me the choice is simple, hit it hard and go home. Just to give you an example, a study in women who performed the same workout session at low intensity (45% of a 8-repetition maximum) had a lower amount of calories burned in the post-exercise period than women who trained with high intensity (85% of a 8-repetition maximum)14. The moral of the story is that those little pink dumbbells are not going to enhance your metabolism compared to throwing some weight on the bar. Intensity is a woman’s best friend for losing fat. If you are up for the challenge, try the 1 second up, 3 seconds down routine using large muscle groups (leg press, chest press, bent rows, ect) for enhanced calorie burning. You may be sore...but think about your revved up metabolism!


1. Ohkawara K, Tanaka S, Miyachi M, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tabata I. A dose-response relation between aerobic exercise and visceral fat reduction: systematic review of clinical trials. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Dec;31(12):1786-97. Epub 2007 Jul 17. Review. Erratum in: Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Feb;32(2):395.
2. Kraemer, W.J., Volek, J.S., Clark, K.L., Gordon, S.E., Puhl, S.M., Koziris, L.P., McBride, J.M., Triplett-McBride, N.T., Putukian, M., Newton, R.U., Hakkinen, K., Bush, J.A., & Sebastianelli, W.J. (1999). Influence of exercise training on physiological and performance changes with weight loss in men. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31, 1320-1329.
3. Park, S.K., Park, J.H., Kwon, Y.C., Kim, H.S., Yoon, M.S., & Park, H.T. (2003). The effect of combined aerobic and resistance exercise training on abdominal fat in obese middle-aged women. Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science, 22 129-135.
4. Schuenke MD, Mikat RP, McBride JM. Effect of an acute period of resistance exercise on excess post-exercise oxygen consumption: implications for body mass management. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Mar;86(5):411-7.
5. Meirelles, Cláudia de Mello and Gomes, Paulo Sergio Chagas. (2004). Acute effects of resistance exercise on energy expenditure: revisiting the impact of the training variables. Rev Bras Med Esporte Vol 10, No 2 Mar/Apr 2004.
6. Dolezal, BA, Potteiger, JA, Jacobsen, DJ, and Benedict, SH. Muscle damage and resting metabolic rate after acute resistance exercise with an eccentric overload. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32: 1202-1207, 2000.
7. Gillette, CA, Bullough, RC, and Melby, CL. Postexercise energy expenditure in response to acute aerobic or resistive exercise. Int J Sport Nutr 4: 347-360, 1994.
8. Melby, C, Scholl, C, Edwards, G, and Bullough, R. Effect of acute resistance exercise on postexercise energy expenditure and resting metabolic rate. J Appl Physiol 75: 1847-1853, 1993.
9. Hackney KJ, Engels HJ, Gretebeck RJ. Resting energy expenditure and delayed-onset muscle soreness after full-body resistance training with an eccentric concentration. J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Sep;22(5):1602-9.
10. Ballor DL, Harvey-berino JR, Ades PA, Cryan J, Calles-Escandon J. Contrasting effects of resistance and aerobic training on body composition and metabolism after diet-induced weight loss. Metabolism 1996; 45:179-83.
11. Bryner RW, Ullrich IH, Sauers J, Donley D, Hornsby G, Kolar M, et al. Effects of resistance vs. aerobic training combined with an 800 calorie liquid diet on lean body mass and resting metabolic rate. J Am Coll Nutr 1999;18:115-21.
12. Ballor DL, Katch VL, Becque MD, Marks CR. Resistance weight training during caloric restriction enhances lean body weight maintenance. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;47:19-25.
13. Burleson MA, O’Bryant HS, Stone MH, Collins MA, Triplet-McBride T. Effect of weight training and treadmill exercise on post-exercise oxygen consumption. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:518-22.
14. Thornton MK, Potteiger JA. Effects of resistance exercise bouts of different intensities but equal work on EPOC. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 715–722
15. LeCheminant JD, Jacobsen DJ, Bailey BW, Mayo MS, Hill JO, Smith BK, Donnelly JE. Effects of long-term aerobic exercise on EPOC. Int J Sports Med. 2008 Jan;29(1):53-8.

Source:musculardevelopment.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Feel free to PM Admin or MODS for any bodybuilding forum related questions.

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
IronMagazine Top Bodybuilding & Fitness Websites Hier gehts zur Topliste